jump to navigation

en route to Kensington April 16, 2009

Posted by Milica Guberinic in Exercise 5: Psychogeographics, Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
7 comments

Hi everybody. This is my map. I was going to explain the meaning of the different objects but I think I will leave it up to you! Route to Kensington

Wait! I just realized something about my map that I thought was post worthy. The many little things sold in china town are designed effects, while the stapled telephone pole is an emergent effect.

Advertisement

My Psychogeographic Map April 15, 2009

Posted by Gingy in Exercise 5: Psychogeographics, Exercises.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

My  map  accurately reflects my feelings on our kensington  adventure. I thought  of our trip as being through specific areas   which you can see on my map. Both of the new  areas to me , Chinatown and Kensington,  are filled with pictures like they were filled with  new and interesting sensory  experiences. Like… sight, all the signs in Chinatown,  and smell of all the food we passed  in the streets. The area that is designated to Kensington has images I took  from the gallery  that  best expressed the  “bohemian”  type feel  it had.  I included and Anarchy symbol  because I found when the  guy at the gallery  called kensington the anarchist part of Toronto  it struck me as  a perfect way to describe the feeling I had when  there. The blue background of the map is very happy and upbeat  because it reflects the beautiful  weather  we had on the day we went on the trip. The OCAD  block on the ma is not as   collages and  “full”  because it is more familiar to me the   the  densely collages areas  of Chinatown  and Kensington Market.

Its been  a great semesterkensigtonexpmap and that field trip  was the  cherry on top 🙂

Psychogeographic Map of Field Trip April 15, 2009

Posted by dario in Exercise 5: Psychogeographics.
Tags: , ,
add a comment
MY IMPRESSION OF FIELD TRIP

SENSES +INTEREST+ EMOTIONS = PSYCHOGEOGRAPHIC  MAP

Exercise 5 (final): Psychogeographics April 8, 2009

Posted by Greg Van Alstyne in Exercise 5: Psychogeographics.
Tags: , , , ,
1 comment so far

Guy Debord is the best known theorist from an (infamous) movement called the “Situationists.” In 1955 he defined Psychogeography as the “the study of the precise laws and specific effects of the geographical environment, consciously organized or not, on the emotions and behavior of individuals” (Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography, 1955).

Debord also wrote “an urban neigborhood is determined not only by  geographical and economic factors, but also by the image that its inhabitants and those of other neighborhoods have of it.”

For your last exercise, practice “psychogeographic mapping” by taking mental notes during our field trip to Kensington Market. Design and post a simple map in the blog in time for our last class together, Thursday April 16.

I’d like you to

  • Pay attention to what your senses tell you
  • Record experiential effects in the route through Chinatown and/or Kensington Market
  • Think of a simple way to express your senses and feelings about the environment, the walk, the ‘feel’ of the places we go through and to today.
  • Contrast this gritty, real, textural urban experience with the digital work we will find in the gallery.
  • Consider the difference between effects that are “designed” — intentional reflections of the vision of the designer or team — and those that are “emergent” — the result of repetitive actions by numerous diverse actors, include wear, layers of residue from postering or graffiti, built up textures and shapes like those that arise as a city block evolves over time.
  • Your map should include and react to these ideas.

Thanks for everything.

–Greg